After
months of legal uncertainty for cloud services, the EU has announced reaching
an agreement in principle with the USA on an updated trans-Atlantic data flow
deal. Products such as Google Fonts, Analytics, Stripe, and Facebook have been
dogged by multiyear complaints relating to trans-Atlantic data flows as these
tech giants have been trying to exhaust all legal challenges. Meta will now
likely not have to suspend its operations as the EU is expected to suspend
EU-USA data transfer enforcements and introduce a grace period until a final
agreement has been reached and the new deal has been adopted.
While
this all sounds good, the fine details of the revised deal and how the gap has
been closed between the EU’s and USA’s 2 very different legal systems was not
made clear at the announcement of this development. Any new deal will face the
prospect of legal challenges, just as the Safe Harbor agreement did in 2015 due
to EU citizen’s privacy rights and US surveillance laws.
Since
the announcement, the White house has released a fact
sheet on the new framework agreement which explains that EU citizens can
seek redress through an independent ‘Data Protection Review Court’ that will
consist of people from outside the US government and can adjudicate claims and
direct remedial measures as necessary. However, the Commission took a similar
approach with Privacy Shield and Safe Harbor in the past, until the court
enacted a very different view. EU commissions and their US counterparts cannot
provide a final assessment here, and only the European Court of Justice can.

Max
Schrems, an outspoken sceptic of trans-Atlantic data transfer deals, voiced his
concerns over this reformed deal by mentioning little reform on the US side. He
also threatened that it was possible, via civil litigation and preliminary
injunction, to take any new agreement to the Court of Justice of the European
Union (CJEU) within months should EU law not be respected in the reformed deal.
He was quoted as saying:
“Once the final text
arrives we will analyse it in depth, together with our U.S. legal experts. If
it is not in line with EU law, we or another group will likely challenge it. In
the end, the Court of Justice will decide a third time. We expect this to be
back at the Court within months from a final decision,” he noted in a
statement, “It is regrettable that the EU and U.S. have not used this situation
to come to a ‘no spy’ agreement, with baseline guarantees among like-minded
democracies. Customers and businesses face more years of legal uncertainty.”
Google,
Meta, and the CCIA technology industry association all predictably welcomed the
news and commended the European Commission and US government for coming to a
new agreement in principle. However, CCIA director Alexandre Roure did express
some concerns for upcoming
EU rules surrounding industrial and connected device data reuse which is
expected to introduce new data restrictions.